Beginning in 2021, the Institute for Cultural Evolution is launching an organization-wide initiative entitled “The Post-Progressive Project,” which advances an inclusive new political perspective. This emerging perspective is founded on “cultural intelligence,” which can help reconcile America’s stark political divide and bring peace to the culture war.
The Post-Progressive Project seeks to build a constituency among leaders and members of the American public who are concerned about the torn social fabric of American culture. Post-progressivism firmly rejects right-wing extremism, but its main focus is on transcending the emerging pathologies of progressivism. Post-progressivism, however, is not anti-progressive. Rather, it seeks to demonstrate what comes after progressivism, both culturally and politically.
Post-progressivism is neither left, nor right, nor centrist—it attempts to synthesize the best of all three of these political positions. The Post-Progressive project will employ public argument and critique, it will produce media and events, and it will foster a membership society for leaders who identify with this new political movement.
The Project has three main objectives for 2021-2022:
1. Grow and deepen the public profile and reputation of the post-progressive political perspective—put this way of thinking on the map.
2. Develop and promote an influential political constituency among people who identify as post-progressive—build a movement.
3. Foster political and cultural evolution on every front of its development—improve American democracy.
The Institute for Cultural Evolution’s Overall Higher Purpose:
The Post-Progressive Project’s Higher Purpose:
The Project’s mission is to express and represent a new kind of higher ground—an enlarged political identity that demonstrates a compelling way forward for America’s cultural evolution.
The Post-Progressive Project’s theory of change is that culture and consciousness coevolve when people expand the scope of what they are able to value. The Project seeks to evolve American politics by helping each political faction better appreciate the intrinsic values of their opponents, as well as the underlying interdependence of America’s overall cultural ecosystem. According to this theory of change, a new era of kindness and cooperation can be brought about by promoting and popularizing the practice of cultural intelligence. Post-progressivism works to advance cultural evolution in three basic ways:
These three interrelated political strategies for fostering cultural evolution are discussed in greater detail in Steve McIntosh’s recent book: Developmental Politics—How America Can Grow into a Better Version of Itself (Paragon House 2020).
“Worldviews” are coherent sets of values and ideals that persists across multiple generations. Worldviews are large-scale, intersubjective cultural agreements about what is good, true, and beautiful. These value frames give meaning to reality and help provide personal identity. Worldviews are arguably the basic units of cultural analysis and interpretation—the most fundamental structures of cultural evolution.
“Post-progressivism” is an emerging cultural and political perspective that honors and synthesizes the best aspects of America’s three major worldviews: modernism, traditionalism, and progressivism. Through the use “cultural intelligence” (defined below), post-progressivism seeks to transcend progressivism’s pathologies, while carrying forward its important gifts. By eschewing the horizontal continuum of left and right, post-progressivism is charting a vertical dimension of normative growth that can lead to a more evolved form of politics and culture.
“Cultural intelligence” is the ability to recognize the mutual interdependence of America’s three major worldviews: traditionalism, modernism, and progressivism. This comprehensive overview perspective sees how the positive values and enduring accomplishments of all three of these distinct value frames form a kind of symbiotic cultural ecosystem wherein each worldview has an ongoing role to play. Cultural intelligence provides the ability to integrate and harmonize these three distinct sets of values. This process begins by clearly distinguishing between the positives and negatives of each worldview.
Progressivism’s positive values include social justice, worldcentric morality, and environmental priority. Whereas its negatives include “anti-modernism,” which fails to recognize how progressive culture itself is predicated on the freedom and prosperity provided by modernity’s liberal values; “reverse patriotism,” which characterizes American history as a sinister criminal enterprise; divisive identity politics, which promotes grievance without gratitude; and tyrannical demands for immediate and uncompromising reform, which disrespect the institution of democracy itself.
Modernism’s positive values include economic and scientific progress, individual liberty, and the rule of law. Whereas modernity’s negatives are seen in its environmental degradation, growing inequality, and nuclear proliferation.
Traditionalism’s positive values include loyalty to family and country, duty and honor, and the sacrifice of self-interest for the greater good. Whereas traditionalism’s negatives are found in its racism, sexism, and homophobia.
Once each worldview’s positives have been clearly distinguished from its abiding negatives—once the dignities have been separated from the disasters—it then becomes possible to integrate positive values from across the political spectrum. Yet crucially, this integration process does not eliminate the political challenges that each worldview poses to the others. Cultural intelligence seeks a kind of dynamic integration that preserves the natural polar tensions that exist between these worldviews. This political approach helps make these ongoing conflicts more functional and constructive by fostering deliberative relationships of challenge and support wherein each worldview can influence and improve its cultural competitors.
The development of human history entails both the social growth of human artifacts, institutions and technologies, as well as the cultural growth of human knowledge, values and ideals. This development is simultaneously physical and objective, psychological and subjective, and collective and intersubjective—the ongoing coevolution of “It, I, and We.” Sociocultural evolution overall counts as real evolution because it extends the structure of evolutionary emergence that began with the big bang, continuing the process through which “something more keeps coming from something less.”
The concept of “cultural evolution” primarily concerns the collective and intersubjective side of this development, with a special emphasis on values. Values are defined and sustained within large scale systems of agreement known as worldviews (defined above), which circumscribe horizons of potential improvement. New worldviews emerge through a dialectical process by pushing off against the shortcomings and pathologies of previous worldviews. Newly appearing worldviews are therefore inevitably defined by their opposition to the limitations of the previously prevailing culture. Yet simultaneously and conversely, new worldviews achieve developmental progress by building on what has come before.
Cultural evolution exhibits many varied characteristics. Viewed from certain perspectives, this growth appears not as a sequential trajectory of step-wise advance, but rather as a “sprawling bush” of development that includes numerous branches, contradictory countercurrents, as well as forces of decay that work against positive development or pervert it into trends that result in social regression. But notwithstanding the chaotic and contingent nature of cultural evolution, the historical record clearly shows how both the worldviews of modernism and progressivism have emerged in opposition to what came before. So even though the developmental trajectory of human culture is not linear and can’t be neatly pigeon-holed into a series of static stages, the dialectical process through which new worldviews emerge does mark the course of history with a structural sequence of emergence that unfolds in clearly identifiable steps. And these discrete steps of worldview emergence can be accurately identified as levels of development, albeit in a very loose and general way. This dialectical sequence of worldview emergence accordingly demonstrates the developmental logic of cultural evolution.
The heartfelt aims of the post-progressive project are expressed in the following “plea” to our fellow Americans:
Dear Fellow Americans,
Let us take care of our country in her hour of need
May our grievances reflect our gratitude
May our challenges express our support
And may our pride and shame be mutually correcting
We feel the pain and alienation of Americans who remain marginalized and excluded
While we affirm the unprecedented opportunity and prosperity that American society continues to provide
We accept our obligation to atone for the misdeeds of America’s history
While we affirm the abundant ways that America makes the world a better place
We recognize the need for environmental sustainability and the preservation of nature
While we affirm the essential morality and ongoing necessity of a prosperous global economy
We revere our heritage and declare our loyalty to the best of who and what has come before
While we remain unsatisfied with the world as it is and affirm the need to keep improving
We honor the enduring values of all three American cultures—traditional, modern, and progressive
While we acknowledge that each of these cultures includes pathologies we must overcome
Our society is growing
So let us advance a politics of mutual respect in which everyone of good faith is welcome
Let us renew our nation’s political life through a new era of cooperation and kindness
Let us cherish our liberties and defend our nation’s integrity
And let us affirm that our winding way to a more evolved culture is a journey worth making